CHICAGO — After weeks of partisan debate and pressure from business groups, the Michigan Legislature repealed a controversial new service tax just hours after it took effect Dec. 1. The roughly $700 million in lost revenue — key to eliminating a $1.75 billion gap in the fiscal 2008 budget — will be replaced with a new 22% surcharge on the Michigan business tax. Both chambers had passed separate repeal bills in the last month, but a final measure was stalled over disagreements over how to replace the revenue, which Gov. Jennifer Granholm said was necessary to win her approval. The repealed tax would have raised $614 million in 2008 and about $713 million annually after that by imposing a 6% tax on a wide swath of services, the majority of which were business-to-business transactions. The new surcharge is expected to raise $750 million annually, according to legislative fiscal analysts. “This agreement protects health care, public safety, and education while replacing revenue from the service tax. I applaud the members of the business community and the legislators who worked with us to craft this fair and responsible compromise,” Granholm said in a statement. Approved by the Senate during an all-night session Friday and by the House and Granholm late Saturday, the final bill puts the business tax surcharge at 21.9%. The measure expires in 2017 or earlier, depending on the state’s economic performance. The lawmakers also agreed to pass a bill later this week giving amnesty and rebates for those who paid the tax during the 17 hours it was law. The surcharge is capped at $6 million for any one business. Many of the state’s smallest businesses will not be affected because they do not pay the Michigan business tax. “When the tax was passed, the Legislature and Gov. Granholm were swamped with complaints,” said Rich Studley, chief lobbyist with the Michigan Chamber of Commerce, one of several business groups that was opposed to the service tax. “It would have raised a lot of money but it would have had a negative impact on economic development and it was bad tax policy, and would have generated years of litigation about what was taxable and what was not.” The compromise bill was passed after an all-night session, similar to the all-night sessions held in late October as lawmakers struggled to pass a balanced 2008 budget before a government shutdown.
-
The California Supreme Court will hear a case challenging the state's 2013 pension changes, after seemingly settling the issue with a 2020 ruling.
8h ago -
The "impressive" investor appetite for tax-exempts has been "holding steady all quarter despite expensive valuations, supply surges and periods of low reinvestment demand," said GW&K Investment Management strategists in a report.
10h ago -
As space becomes an increasingly important frontier for development and competition, spaceports should enjoy the same financial benefits as airports and seaports, say supporters of the federal legislation.
11h ago -
The governor should have involved the legislature earlier in decision making on how to give the Water and Power Authority money to make a bond payment, lawmakers said.
April 24 -
A Utah law may be tapped to issue bonds to renovate a downtown Salt Lake City basketball arena to accommodate the former Arizona Coyotes.
April 24 -
Along with UBS' departure from the negotiated underwriting space, various firms have hired talent from both firms to increase their primary and secondary market presence. Many hope for some positive effects in both competition and secondary market liquidity as a result.
April 24