Regional News

Denver Schools Defends Derivatives

AUG 11, 2010 7:30pm ET
Print
Email
Reprints
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+

DALLAS — Denver Public Schools officials are defending a 2008 derivatives deal amid accusations that the district took unnecessary risks that cost millions of dollars and harmed its ability to hire teachers.

The $750 million issue of certificates of participation was designed to close a $400 million gap in the DPS pension fund. It became a political issue in the weeks before Tuesday’s primary election victory by U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet over former Colorado House Speaker Andrew Romanoff.

An Aug. 5 story on the front page of the New York Times said Bennet and current superintendent Thomas Boasberg, who was chief operating officer at the time of the deal, convinced the school board to approve an “exotic” financing scheme that included interest-rate swaps insured by Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. with liquidity from Dexia Credit Local, which has since exited the market. Dexia Group was the fourth-largest letter-of-credit provider in 2008, a record year for variable-rate debt with volume of $120 billion.

According to the Times, the deal has backfired on the district, which has already paid $115 million in interest and other fees. That’s at least $25 million more than it originally anticipated.

Interest rates that were projected at 5% spiked to 8.59%, according to the Times, and now average about 7.12%.

To escape its 30-year commitment in the deal, the district would have to pay termination fees of $81 million or about 19% of its $420 million payroll.

The Times article said: “Denver has paid about $9.7 million more in fees for its deal than it would have had it chosen a simpler transaction.”

JPMorgan was senior manager with RBC Capital Markets as financial adviser. Bank of America and RBC were also counterparties on two of the swaps.

The Times article questioned the timing of the derivatives deal in the spring of 2008 after the auction-rate securities market collapsed. The district deal was similar to auction-rate securities in that rates reset weekly. However, the Denver school deal was designed as a synthetic fixed-rate with the counterparties swapping variable-to-fixed rates.

With the DPS deal suddenly a hot-button issue, the district and its board last week issued letters and statements contradicting much of the Times story.

Boasberg and DPS Board president Nate Easley Jr. said the district saved $20 million by doing the deal, instead of doing nothing, in a letter to constituents.

“DPS has been able to increase spending in the classroom to better serve our kids,” Boasberg and Easley said. “That additional investment in our classrooms is a direct result of the savings from the pension financing.”

In a separate letter with other board members, Easley called the 2008 deal “far from exotic,” saying it was structured exactly like a 2005 transaction completed before Bennet or Boasberg joined DPS.

“Despite the high-pitched rhetoric currently surrounding the issue, the financing structure the district used is very commonly employed,” the board wrote. “Over 100 public entities in Colorado have issued over 500 variable-rate issues in the last decade alone.” The board also disputed the targeted interest rates cited by the Times.

“Approval for the financing was given by the DPS Board on the basis that the rate would be 6%. The rate is currently at 6.1%,” district officials said. “There was never a 5% projection.”

However, the original deal called for DPS to pay a fixed rate of 4.859% in exchange for 100% of one-month London Interbank Offered Rate.

The interest rate spiked and additional fees accrued when the insurer was downgraded and the COPs were put to Dexia in September 2008. The district was able to remarket the certificates in January 2009 after negotiating a new rate with Dexia. The district’s interest costs for fiscal 2009 exceeded budget by about $24 million, according to Standard & Poor’s.

“The district’s recent all-in costs, including the spread over one-month Libor, and remarketing and letter-of-credit fees, have been as high as 7.1%,” analysts wrote in late 2009, “but this is still under its budgeted interest cost of 7.5%, according to the district.”

Despite problems with the pension COPs, the district’s ratings have not been affected. Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings maintain a AA-minus on DPS, while Moody’s Investors Service rates it Aa3. All three ratings have stable outlooks.

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

markets
markets
markets

Social

facebook
linkedin

New York's budget leaves it at risk of becoming one of only five states that do not allow the use of design-build procurement to deliver public infrastructure projects.

Upcoming Events

the bond buyer conferences
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.